![]() ![]() On the other hand, it is a breeze in Stata. Ever try to run a probit in SPSS? Nearly impossible and the documentation stinks. I rarely use it, whereas I use Stata almost every day. The only reason that I keep SPSS on my machine is that I am not pressed for disk space. I have heard that the ANOVA commands in SPSS is also user friendly. ![]() Second, SPSS has a nice routine in their logistic regression model for testing interactions. But thanks to people like Nick Cox, that difference is decreasing daily. The two advantages are that it is slightly more user friendly in making complex tables and graphs. In my opinion, SPSS has only two slight advantages and many, many disadvantages. I have both Stata and SPSS on my computer. ![]() of Methodology and StatisticsMaastricht University Of course Iknow allready about the great possibilities of programming but I hope tofind some answers about not to exotic statistical methods. Since I am notvery familiar with SPSS I hope to find an answere on the list. One of the things my colleages are interested inis what they can do with STATA that they can't do with SPSS. Stata vs SPSS Stata vs SPSSThe following comments on Stata vs SPSS were made on Statalist, digest issues of 2-4 November 2000.Īfter studying Stata for about half a year my department asked me to tellthem some more about STATA. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |